ਆਕਸਫ਼ੋਰਡ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਸ਼ਬਦਕੋਸ਼

ਆਕਸਫ਼ੋਰਡ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਸ਼ਬਦਕੋਸ਼ (ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ: Oxford English Dictionary, OED) ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਭਾਸ਼ਾ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ ਸ਼ਬਦਕੋਸ਼ ਜੋ ਆਕਸਫ਼ੋਰਡ ਯੂਨੀਵਰਸਿਟੀ ਪ੍ਰੈੱਸ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਛਾਪਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ।^[1] ਇਹ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਭਾਸ਼ਾ ਦੇ ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕ ਵਿਕਾਸ ਤੇ ਝਲਕ ਪਾਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਵਿਦਵਾਨ ਅਤੇ ਅਕਾਦਮਿਕ ਖੋਜਕਾਰਨ ਲਈ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਆਪਕ ਸਰੋਤ ਮੁਹੱਈਆ ਕਰਾਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਸੰਸਾਰ ਭਰ ਦੇ ਬਹੁਤ ਸਾਰੇ ਉਪਯੋਗਿਕ ਫਰਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ।^[2]^[3] ਦੂਜਾ ਏਡੀਸ਼ਨ 1989 ਵਿੱਚ ਛਾਪਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਦੀਆਂ 20 ਕਿਤਾਬਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ 21,728 ਸਫ਼ੇ ਸਨ.

ਹਵਾਲੇ

↑ "Guide to the Third Edition of the OED". Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 6 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2015. Retrieved 30 August 2014. The Oxford English Dictionary is not an arbiter of proper usage, despite its widespread reputation to the contrary. The Dictionary is intended to be descriptive, not prescriptive. In other words, its content should be viewed as an objective reflection of English language usage, not a subjective collection of usage 'dos' and 'don'ts'.
↑ "As a historical dictionary, the OED is very different from those of current English, in which the focus is on present-day meanings." [1]
↑ "The OED is a historical dictionary, with a structure that is very different from that of a dictionary of current English."[2] Archived 2015-09-05 at the Wayback Machine.

ਹੋਰ ਪੜ੍ਹੋ

Brewer, Charlotte (8 October 2019). "Oxford English Dictionary Research". Examining the OED. The project sets out to investigate the principles and practice behind the Oxford English Dictionary...
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).
Dickson, Andrew (23 February 2018). "Inside the OED: can the world's biggest dictionary survive the internet?". the Guardian.
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).
Gleick, James (5 November 2006). "Cyber-Neologoliferation". James Gleick. Archived from the original on 20 April 2020. Retrieved 16 April 2020. First published in The New York Times Magazine 5 November 2006
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).
Kelsey-Sugg, Anna (9 April 2020). "In a backyard 'scriptorium', this man set about defining every word in the English language". ABC News (Radio National). Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Kite, Lorien (15 November 2013), "The evolving role of the Oxford English Dictionary", Financial Times (online edition)
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value). (McPherson is Senior Editor of OED)
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).
ਫਰਮਾ:Cite podcast
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).
Lua error in ਮੌਡਿਊਲ:Citation/CS1 at line 3162: attempt to call field 'year_check' (a nil value).

ਬਾਹਰੀ ਲਿੰਕ

ਅਧਿਕਾਰਿਤ ਵੈੱਬਸਾਈਟ
- Archive of documents, including
  - Trench's original "On some deficiencies in our English Dictionaries" Archived 8 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine. paper
  - Murray's original appeal for readers Archived 8 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine.
- Their page of OED statistics Archived 8 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine., and another such page.
- Two "sample pages" (PDF). (1.54 MB) from the OED.
Oxford University Press pages: Second Edition, Additions Series Volume 1, Additions Series Volume 2, Additions Series Volume 3, The Compact Oxford English Dictionary New Edition, 20-volume printed set+CD-ROM^{[permanent dead link]}, CD 3.1 upgrade^{[permanent dead link]}, CD 4.0 full^{[permanent dead link]}, CD 4.0 upgrade^{[permanent dead link]}

[1] "Guide to the Third Edition of the OED". Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 6 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2015. Retrieved 30 August 2014. The Oxford English Dictionary is not an arbiter of proper usage, despite its widespread reputation to the contrary. The Dictionary is intended to be descriptive, not prescriptive. In other words, its content should be viewed as an objective reflection of English language usage, not a subjective collection of usage 'dos' and 'don'ts'.

[2] "As a historical dictionary, the OED is very different from those of current English, in which the focus is on present-day meanings." [1]

[3] "The OED is a historical dictionary, with a structure that is very different from that of a dictionary of current English."[2] Archived 2015-09-05 at the Wayback Machine.

[1]

[2]

[3]